{"id":17836,"date":"2021-03-19T08:38:49","date_gmt":"2021-03-19T07:38:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/?p=17836"},"modified":"2025-09-08T10:05:42","modified_gmt":"2025-09-08T08:05:42","slug":"cutanje-ali-ipak-saradnja-bitna-odluka-evropskog-suda-pravde","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/cutanje-ali-ipak-saradnja-bitna-odluka-evropskog-suda-pravde\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"display: none;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"display: none;\"><\/div>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u201e\u0106utanje je zlato\u201d, ka\u017ee stara arapska poslovica.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>I izgleda da je to istina i dan danas \u2013 \u010dak i u pravu, \u010dak i u velikom slu\u010daju pred Evropskim sudom pravde. Kako bismo saznali za\u0161to je \u0107utanje odjednom va\u017eno \u2013 i to toliko da je uskome\u0161alo advokate \u0161irom Evrope \u2013 moramo da krenemo od po\u010detka pri\u010de.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>\u0160ta se desilo?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Evropski sud pravde (<b>ESP<\/b>) je 2.2.2021. u odgovoru na prethodno pitanje od strane Ustavnog suda Italije \u2013 u slu\u010daju DB protiv Italijanske nacionalne komisije za kompanije i akcije (<b>Consob<\/b>) \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/jcms\/upload\/docs\/application\/pdf\/2021-02\/cp210011en.pdf\"><span class=\"s2\">objavio<\/span><\/a> krucijalnu odluku kada se radi o pravima fizi\u010dkih lica u postupku. Ovaj slu\u010daj se odnosi na kaznu odre\u0111enu fizi\u010dkom licu (<b>DB<\/b>) za tzv. \u201einsider dealing\u201c i za odbijanje saradnje u kontekstu upravne istrage.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Naime, ESP smatra da (i) <a href=\"http:\/\/ravnopravnost.gov.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/images_files_Povelja%2520Evropske%2520unije%2520o%2520osnovnim%2520pravima.pdf\"><span class=\"s2\">Povelja Evropske unije o osnovnim pravima<\/span><\/a> (<b>Povelja<\/b>) predvi\u0111a postojanje prava na \u0107utanje za fizi\u010dka lica (ii) da ovo pravo isklju\u010duje odre\u0111ivanje kazni fizi\u010dkim licima koja odbijaju da pru\u017ee potencijalno samooptu\u017euju\u0107e odgovore dr\u017eavnim organima koji vode istragu.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Opa! Ba\u0161 velika stvar\u2026 valjda.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>Je l\u2019 mo\u017ee\u0161 da pojednostavi\u0161?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Hajde da celu stvar razlo\u017eimo:<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">Italijanska nacionalna komisija za kompanije i akcije (Consob) kaznila je izvesnog DB kaznom od 300,000 evra ukupno zbog upravnog prestupa <i>insider dealing-<\/i>a.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>(Najjednostavnije re\u010deno, <i>insider dealing<\/i> podrazumeva <i>\u2013 ilegalno <\/i>\u2013 trgovanje hartijama od vrednosti neke kompanije, koje se bazira na poverljivim informacijama.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>Koga zanima vi\u0161e, neka pogleda <span class=\"s2\">ovde<\/span>).<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">Dodatno, Consob ga je kaznio sa 50,000 evra \u2013 zbog uskra\u0107ivanja saradnje u istrazi u upravnom postupku. DB je prvo nekoliko puta odlagao pojavljivanje pred Consob-om, a onda odbio da odgovori na odre\u0111ena pitanja.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">Nadle\u017eni sud u Rimu je brzo odbio njegovu \u017ealbu koja se odnosila na drugu kaznu od 50,000 evra. DB nije odustao i ulo\u017eio je pravni lek Vrhovnom kasacionom sudu. <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li1\"><span class=\"s1\">Opet, Vrhovnom kasacionom sudu je bila neophodna pomo\u0107 Ustavnog suda Italije. Italijansko zakonodavstvo predvi\u0111a da odbijanje saradnje sa Consob-om u ovakvim slu\u010dajevima mora da bude sankcionisana. Ali, iskrslo je pitanje \u2013 <\/span><span class=\"s4\">da li je to u saglasnosti sa pravom na \u0107utanje<\/span><span class=\"s1\">?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>\u010cekaj malo!<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>Pravo na \u0107utanje?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>\u0160ta je to?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Uop\u0161teno, pravo na \u0107utanje je pravni princip koji osloba\u0111a obaveze odgovaranja na odre\u0111ena pitanja. Bilo da se radi o pitanjima koja postavlja policija u istrazi, pitanjima pred sudom ili \u010dak nekim drugim nadle\u017enim telom \u2013 kakvo je npr. Consob.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>OK, shvatio.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>I, je l\u2019 DB imao pravo da \u0107uti?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\"><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span>To je ne\u0161to \u0161to je bilo te\u0161ko i za italijanski Ustavni sud da odlu\u010di.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>Pitanje je komplikovano jer:<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">Pravo na \u0107utanje je priznato pravno na\u010delo, pred policijom ali i u krivi\u010dnom postupku. Kako u Italiji, tako i \u0161irom (\u010dak se nalazi u <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/constitution\/fifth_amendment\"><span class=\"s2\">Petom amandmanu<\/span><\/a>!).<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">Ali DB je u\u010destvovao u upravnom postupku, u kome pitanje prava na \u0107utanje nije bilo re\u0161eno. Iako se radi samo o upravnoj istrazi, DB je mogao \u2013 ne iskoristiv\u0161i svoje pravo \u0107utanja i odav\u0161i\u2026 delikatne informacije \u2013 da ugrozi svoju poziciju u eventualnom krivi\u010dnom postupku. Ili da \u010dak dovede do pokretanja jednog protiv sebe. <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s3\"><span class=\"s5\">Na osnovu odredbe italijanskog zakona (Decreto legislativo n. 58, Article 187)<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s1\"> DB je dobio kaznu od 50000 evra. Ta odredba je, pak, usvojena kao implementacija<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/ALL\/?uri=CELEX:32003L0006\"><span class=\"s2\">Direktive 2003\/6\/EC Evropskog parlamenta i saveta<\/span><\/a> (<b>Direktiva<\/b>) i <a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=CELEX:32014R0596\"><span class=\"s2\">Uredbe 596\/2014 Evropskog parlamenta i saveta<\/span><\/a> (<b>Uredba<\/b>). Direktiva i Uredba u su\u0161tini nala\u017eu da lice koje odbija da sara\u0111uje u upravno istrazi treba da bude ka\u017enjeno.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li1\"><span class=\"s1\">Sa druge strane, nije jasno da li su te odredbe u skladu sa Poveljom Evropske unije o osnovnim pravima koja je nezaobilazan akt kada se radi o osnovnim i ljudskim pravima u EU. Mala napomena: Povelja ne spominje pravo na \u0107utanje izri\u010dito! <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>U pravu si. Jeste komplikovano. \u0160ta je Ustavni sud odlu\u010dio?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Ni\u0161ta. Morao je da pita ESP da li su gorepomenuta italijanska odredba, Direktiva i Uredba u skladu sa Poveljom i pretpostavljenim pravom na \u0107utanje sadr\u017eanim u njoj. U su\u0161tini, Ustavni sud je pitao ESP da protuma\u010di pravo Evropske unije, pre nego \u0161to sam donese presudu. Taj proces se zove <span class=\"s2\">dono\u0161enje odluke o prethodnom pitanju<\/span>. \u0160ta re\u0107i? Ne postoje advokati za d\u017eabe \u2013 pravo <i>jeste <\/i>komplikovano!<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>To sam ve\u0107 shvatio, hvala.<\/b><\/span><b> <\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>Nastavi, molim te\u2026<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Sve u svemu, na pitanje je prvo odgovorio Generalni advokat (<b>GA<\/b>) Pikam\u00e4e. Generalni advokat nisu sudije. oni <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/jcms\/jcms\/Jo2_7024\/en\/#composition\"><span class=\"s2\">ne donose odluke<\/span><\/a>, but ve\u0107 poma\u017eu sudu i daju mi\u0161ljenja o slu\u010dajevima koji su im dodeljeni. Ipak, njihovi stavovi imaju veliku te\u017einu i <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pinsentmasons.com\/out-law\/analysis\/how-often-does-the-ecj-follow-advocates-general-or-should-that-be-cjeu\"><span class=\"s2\">uglavnom odgovaraju kasnijim sudskim odlukama<\/span><\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&amp;docid=232962&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=en&amp;mode=req&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=11041646#Footref14\"><span class=\"s2\">Mi\u0161ljenje generalnog advokata u ovom slu\u010daju<\/span><\/a> se mo\u017ee sumirati u \u010detiri va\u017ene ta\u010dke:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">Kada god fizi\u010dkom licu preti opasnost od krivi\u010dnog postupka \u2013 postoji pravo na \u0107utanje.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">\u0160to se ti\u010de uskla\u0111enosti gorepomenute Direktive i Uredbe sa Poveljom, generalni advokat smatra da one ostavljaju \u0161irok prostor dr\u017eavama u pogledu primene. Nacionalna prava mogu da kazne povrede kakve je u\u010dinio DB na nekoliko na\u010dina: krivi\u010dno, upravnim kaznama krivi\u010dne prirode, ili samo upravnim merama. Iako su Direktiva i Uredba zami\u0161ljene kao obavezuju\u0107e, treba ih tuma\u010diti u skladu sa Poveljom i osnovnim pravima.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">GA smatra da je pravo na \u0107utanje sadr\u017eano u \u010dlanu 47 (Pravo na efikasan pravni lek i pravi\u010dno su\u0111enje) i \u010dlanu 48 (Pretpostavka nevinosti i pravo na odbranu) Povelje.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li1\"><span class=\"s1\">Evropski sud za ljudska prava (<b>ESLjP<\/b>) je usvojio princip da pravo na \u0107utanje postoji u slu\u010dajevima koji imaju implikacije na postojanje krivice i kaznu. Stoga, GA je iskoristio taj princip i u ovom slu\u010daju, navev\u0161i da je pravo na \u0107utanje tako\u0111e primenjivo tamo gde<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>izjave fizi\u010dkog lica imaju uticaja na osudu ili kaznu izre\u010denu na kraju upravnog postupka, ukoliko situacija potpada pod \u010dlan 6 Evropske povelje o ljudskim pravima (tj. da se radi o krivi\u010dnoj stvari u smislu tog \u010dlana).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>A \u0161ta su rekle sudije?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Pa, bilo je jasno od po\u010detka! \u201e\u0106utanje je zlato\u201c, odlu\u010dno je rekao sud.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>Sudska odluka je u velikoj meri u skladu sa mi\u0161ljenjem generalnog advokata. Ali\u2026 to nije sve. Hajde da navedemo najva\u017enije stvari u odluci (da, obe\u0107avam, ne\u0107e vi\u0161e biti \u201ebullet point\u201c-a!)<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">Pravo na \u0107utanje proizilazi iz \u010dlanova 47 i 48<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>\u2013 zapravo, ono je fundament prava na pravi\u010dno su\u0111enje.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>NAJVA\u017dNIJE: <\/b>Pravo na \u0107utanje <b>ISKLJU\u010cUJE<\/b> (izme\u0111u ostalog) \u2018<b>kazne odre\u0111ene fizi\u010dkim licima koja su \u201eoptu\u017eena\u201c za odbijanje da relevantnom organu <\/b>(u skladu sa Direktivom i Uredbom) <b>pru\u017ee odgovore koji bi mogli da dovedu do njihove odgovornosti za prestup koji je ka\u017enjiv bilo po upravnim sankcijama krivi\u010dne prirode, ili do njihove krivi\u010dne odgovornosti<\/b> (podebljano \u2013 autor). Ova odluka tako\u0111e smatra da je u ovakvim slu\u010dajevima relevantno i pravo ESLjP, \u0161to je bio i stav generalnog advokata. <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li4\"><span class=\"s1\">Dr\u017eave \u010dlanice moraju da se postaraju da je ovo sprovedeno pred nacionalnim sudovima.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Da li to zna\u010di da se saradnja sa odgovaraju\u0107im telom mo\u017ee prosto odbiti?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>Da Direktiva i Uredba nisu u skladu sa Poveljom? Ne. One moraju da se tuma\u010de u skladu sa njom. Postoje <b>mnogi drugi oblici nesaradnje<\/b> u upravnom postupku. I svi oni mogu i treba da budu sankcionisani. \u201ePravo na \u0107utanje ne mo\u017ee, ipak, da opravda svaki vid nesaradnje od strane fizi\u010dkog lica, kao \u0161to su odbijanje da se pojavi pred organom na saslu\u0161anju ili kori\u0161\u0107enje taktika odlaganja kako bi to saslu\u0161anje odlo\u017eila.\u201c Dakle, <b>kazne za nedostatak saradnje u upravnom postupku su i dalje u ve\u0107oj meri netaknute<\/b>.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Za\u0161to je sve ovo bitno? I \u0161ta sad?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Re\u0161eno je do sad neodlu\u010deno pitanje,<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>koje \u0107e verovatno imati implikacije na bezbroj budu\u0107ih slu\u010dajeva. Kako u sferi ljudskih prava, tako i \u0161ire. Postavlja se va\u017ean precedent u pravu EU: a nema potrebe nagla\u0161avati da je sama EU sastavljena od 27 dr\u017eava i da je EU pravo bitno i za ogroman dr\u017eava \u0161irom sveta. Kako mo\u017ee da ne bude bitno?<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Kona\u010dno, jasno je da bi ova odluka trebalo da bude primenjena na sve relevantne postupke koji proizilaze iz zakonodavstva Evropske unije. U svakom slu\u010daju, u pravu konkurencije, ova odluka otvara zanimljiva pitanja u pogledu prava na odbranu u postupcima gde se sankcije mogu primeniti na fizi\u010dka lica i korporacije.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Dakle, u slu\u010daju kada pojedinci odbiju da sara\u0111uju, u skladu sa pravom na \u0107utanje, ova odluka implicira da nadle\u017ene vlasti treba da se uzdr\u017ee od sankcije za nesaradnju. Uzev\u0161i to u obzir, da li bi to trebalo da zna\u010di da i kompanije treba da pro\u0111u bez posledica?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">\u0160ta \u0107e se dalje dogoditi, prerano je re\u0107i. Kako \u0107e ta\u010dno ovo novo tuma\u010denje prava EU biti primenjeno u praksi? Kakav \u0107e biti uticaj na nacionalna prava? To jo\u0161 ostaje da se vidi.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Autor: Nikola Vjetrovi\u0107<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201e\u0106utanje je zlato\u201d, ka\u017ee stara arapska poslovica.\u00a0 I izgleda da je to istina i dan danas \u2013 \u010dak i u pravu, \u010dak i u velikom slu\u010daju pred Evropskim sudom pravde. Kako bismo saznali za\u0161to je \u0107utanje odjednom va\u017eno \u2013 i to toliko da je uskome\u0161alo advokate \u0161irom Evrope \u2013 moramo da krenemo od po\u010detka pri\u010de.\u00a0 \u0160ta se desilo? Evropski sud pravde (ESP) je 2.2.2021. u odgovoru na prethodno pitanje od strane Ustavnog suda Italije \u2013 u slu\u010daju DB protiv Italijanske nacionalne komisije za kompanije i akcije (Consob) \u2013 objavio krucijalnu odluku kada se radi o pravima fizi\u010dkih lica u postupku. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17847,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1201],"tags":[469,1591,667],"class_list":["post-17836","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pravo-evropske-unije","tag-gecic-law-firm-serbia-sr","tag-consob","tag-european-law-sr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde | Geci\u0107 Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u201e\u0106utanje je zlato\u201d, ka\u017ee stara arapska poslovica.\u00a0 I izgleda da je to istina i dan danas \u2013 \u010dak i u pravu, \u010dak i u velikom slu\u010daju pred...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sr_RS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde | Geci\u0107 Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u201e\u0106utanje je zlato\u201d, ka\u017ee stara arapska poslovica.\u00a0 I izgleda da je to istina i dan danas \u2013 \u010dak i u pravu, \u010dak i u velikom slu\u010daju pred...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Geci\u0107 Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-19T07:38:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-08T08:05:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"770\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"421\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"stefan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Napisano od\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"stefan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Procenjeno vreme \u010ditanja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"stefan\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/6da1a36ae431e659988e851fe3a9cf83\"},\"headline\":\"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-19T07:38:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-08T08:05:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/\"},\"wordCount\":1490,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Advokatska kancelarija Geci\u0107 Law\",\"Consob\",\"Evropsko pravo\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Pravo Evropske unije\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/\",\"name\":\"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde | Geci\u0107 Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-19T07:38:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-08T08:05:42+00:00\",\"description\":\"\u201e\u0106utanje je zlato\u201d, ka\u017ee stara arapska poslovica.\u00a0 I izgleda da je to istina i dan danas \u2013 \u010dak i u pravu, \u010dak i u velikom slu\u010daju pred...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg\",\"width\":770,\"height\":421},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/\",\"name\":\"Geci\u0107 Law\",\"description\":\"Advokatska kancelarija\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Geci\u0107 Law\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":409,\"caption\":\"Geci\u0107 Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/6da1a36ae431e659988e851fe3a9cf83\",\"name\":\"stefan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/59099af461191b217c7b825d928bcba2b02d1b3c89de8338854bc40abd2b30c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/59099af461191b217c7b825d928bcba2b02d1b3c89de8338854bc40abd2b30c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"stefan\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/author\/stefan\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde | Geci\u0107 Law","description":"\u201e\u0106utanje je zlato\u201d, ka\u017ee stara arapska poslovica.\u00a0 I izgleda da je to istina i dan danas \u2013 \u010dak i u pravu, \u010dak i u velikom slu\u010daju pred...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/","og_locale":"sr_RS","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde | Geci\u0107 Law","og_description":"\u201e\u0106utanje je zlato\u201d, ka\u017ee stara arapska poslovica.\u00a0 I izgleda da je to istina i dan danas \u2013 \u010dak i u pravu, \u010dak i u velikom slu\u010daju pred...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/","og_site_name":"Geci\u0107 Law","article_published_time":"2021-03-19T07:38:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-08T08:05:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":770,"height":421,"url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"stefan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Napisano od":"stefan","Procenjeno vreme \u010ditanja":"6 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/"},"author":{"name":"stefan","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/6da1a36ae431e659988e851fe3a9cf83"},"headline":"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde","datePublished":"2021-03-19T07:38:49+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-08T08:05:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/"},"wordCount":1490,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg","keywords":["Advokatska kancelarija Geci\u0107 Law","Consob","Evropsko pravo"],"articleSection":["Pravo Evropske unije"],"inLanguage":"sr-RS"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/","url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/","name":"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde | Geci\u0107 Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg","datePublished":"2021-03-19T07:38:49+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-08T08:05:42+00:00","description":"\u201e\u0106utanje je zlato\u201d, ka\u017ee stara arapska poslovica.\u00a0 I izgleda da je to istina i dan danas \u2013 \u010dak i u pravu, \u010dak i u velikom slu\u010daju pred...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sr-RS","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sr-RS","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/imago.jpg","width":770,"height":421},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/silent-but-not-uncooperative-an-important-decision-by-the-ecj\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u0106utanje, ali ipak saradnja \u2013 bitna odluka Evropskog suda pravde"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/","name":"Geci\u0107 Law","description":"Advokatska kancelarija","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sr-RS"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization","name":"Geci\u0107 Law","url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sr-RS","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png","width":1000,"height":409,"caption":"Geci\u0107 Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/6da1a36ae431e659988e851fe3a9cf83","name":"stefan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sr-RS","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/59099af461191b217c7b825d928bcba2b02d1b3c89de8338854bc40abd2b30c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/59099af461191b217c7b825d928bcba2b02d1b3c89de8338854bc40abd2b30c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"stefan"},"url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/author\/stefan\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17836","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17836"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17836\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47452,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17836\/revisions\/47452"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17847"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}