{"id":18627,"date":"2021-06-07T10:00:27","date_gmt":"2021-06-07T08:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/?p=18627"},"modified":"2021-06-04T16:24:30","modified_gmt":"2021-06-04T14:24:30","slug":"amazon-eu-porezi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/","title":{"rendered":"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Drugi najvi\u0161i sud EU stao je na stranu tehnolo\u0161kog giganta zaklju\u010div\u0161i da Amazon ne duguje milione neplac\u0301enog poreza Luksemburgu. Op\u0161ti sud (\u201e<strong>Sud<\/strong>\u201c) je 12. maja 2021. godine ukinuo nalog Evropske komisije (\u201e<strong>Komisija<\/strong>\u201c) Amazonu da <a href=\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/evropska-unija-amazon-srbija-multinacionalne-kompanije\/\">plati<\/a> 250 miliona evra Luksemburgu, kao povra\u0107aj nedozvoljene dr\u017eavne pomoc\u0301i.<\/p>\n<p>Naime, Sud <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/jcms\/upload\/docs\/application\/pdf\/2021-05\/cp210079en.pdf\">smatra<\/a> da se <a href=\"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/competition\/state_aid\/cases\/253200\/253200_1851004_674_2.pdf\">inicijalno stanovi\u0161te Evropske komisije<\/a> o navodnoj prednosti zasniva na analizi koja je neta\u010dna u nekoliko aspekata. Ukratko, Op\u0161ti sud tvrdi da nijedano stanovi\u0161te koje je Komisija iznela u pobijanoj odluci nije dovoljno da doka\u017ee postojanje prednosti u smislu \u010dlana 107 (1) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mei.gov.rs\/upload\/documents\/eu_dokumenta\/ugovor_eu.pdf\">Ugovora o funkcionisanju Evropske unije<\/a>, usled \u010dega se pobijana odluka mora poni\u0161titi u celosti. \u201e<em>Komisija nije dokazala postojanje odgovaraju\u0107eg pravnog standarda da je do\u0161lo do nezakonitog smanjenja poreske obaveze evropskog ogranka Amazona<\/em>\u201c, zaklju\u010dio je Sud.<\/p>\n<p>U <a href=\"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/commission\/presscorner\/detail\/en\/STATEMENT_21_2468\">izjavi<\/a> koja je usledila nakon odluke Suda o slu\u010daju Amazon, izvr\u0161na potpredsednica Margaret Vestager naglasila je da, iako dr\u017eave \u010dlanice imaju isklju\u010divu nadle\u017enost da urede svoju poresku politiku, to moraju u\u010diniti u skladu sa pravom EU, uklju\u010dujuc\u0301i pravila o dr\u017eavnoj pomoc\u0301i. \u0160tavi\u0161e, aludirala je na me\u0111unarodnu saradnju nakon predloga Bajdenove administracije o ustanovljavanju minimalne stope poreza na dobit pravnih lica na globalnom nivou kao i na ambicioznu <a href=\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/eu-digitalna-saga-pocetak-kraja-dominacije-tehnoloskih-giganta\/\">reformu<\/a> digitalnih tr\u017ei\u0161tima. \u201e<em>Blizu smo postizanju istorijskog globalnog sporazuma o reformi me\u0111unarodnog okvira za porez na dobit pravnih lica. \u0160tavi\u0161e, Komisija je u procesu dono\u0161enja predloga za digitalni porez, u smislu da kompanije koje imaju koristi od jedinstvenog digitalnog tr\u017ei\u0161ta po\u0161teno doprinose bud\u017eetu EU <\/em>\u201c, istakla je Vestager.<\/p>\n<p>S druge strane, Amazon je <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/technology\/amazon-says-eu-court-agrees-it-had-no-special-luxembourg-tax-treatment-2021-05-12\/\">pozdravio<\/a> odluku Suda, isti\u010duc\u0301i da je ista u skladu sa njihovim dugogodi\u0161njim stavom da su po\u0161tovali sve va\u017eec\u0301e zakone kao i da Amazon nije imao nikakav preferencijalni tretman.<\/p>\n<p>Bez obzira na pravne neuspehe, Komisija nije odustala od borbe protiv tzv. preferencijalnih aran\u017emana u pogledu poreza na dobit pravnih lica u EU, prelivajuc\u0301i na taj na\u010din fiskalni teret za oporavak od pusto\u0161i koju je izazvala pandemija COVID-19 na multinacionalne kompanije koje su do sada u\u017eivale prednosti zlatnog doba izbegavanja poreza. Me\u0111utim, bavljenje poreskim izazovima koje pokrec\u0301e digitalna ekonomija trenutno je glavni prioritet OECD-a i G-20 i od samog po\u010detka bila je klju\u010dna oblast u <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oecd.org\/tax\/beps\/beps-about.htm\/\">Projektu erozije poreske osnovice i preusmeravanja dobiti<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Da zaklju\u010dimo, ovo je jo\u0161 jedan veliki udarac za \u201ePoresku damu\u201c, Margaret Vestager, koja vodi sna\u017enu kampanju za spre\u010davanje poreske evazije i suzbijanje preferencijalnih aran\u017emana koje dr\u017eave pru\u017eaju multinacionalnim kompanijama. \u0160tavi\u0161e, ovo je trec\u0301i put da je evropski Sud utvrdio da Komisija nije uspela da doka\u017ee da je multinacionalna kompanija imala koristi od dr\u017eavne pomoc\u0301i. Naime, presuda u slu\u010daju Amazona usledila je nakon pro\u0161logodi\u0161njeg veliki poraza Komisije, kada je Sud poni\u0161tio \u010duvenu odluku Komisije da Apple duguje Irskoj iznos od 14,3 milijarde evra na ime poreskog duga i pripadaju\u0107ih kamata (vi\u0161e detalja dostupno <a href=\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/apple-zadao-udarac-komisiji\/\">ovde<\/a>), kao i <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&amp;docid=218101&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=EN&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=361651\">presude<\/a> kojom je bilo nalo\u017eeno Starbaksu da plati 30 miliona evra poreskog duga Holandskoj vladi, a koja je ukinuta jo\u0161 2019. godine.<\/p>\n<p>U svakom slu\u010daju, Komisija ima pravo na \u017ealbu na ovu odluku i to najvi\u0161em evropskom sudu, Evropskom sudu pravde. Buduc\u0301i da je izvr\u0161na potpredsednica izjavila da c\u0301e Komisija pa\u017eljivo prou\u010diti presudu i razmotriti slede\u0107e korake, nestrpljivi smo da vidimo \u0161ta c\u0301e se dalje dogoditi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Drugi najvi\u0161i sud EU stao je na stranu tehnolo\u0161kog giganta zaklju\u010div\u0161i da Amazon ne duguje milione neplac\u0301enog poreza Luksemburgu. Op\u0161ti sud (\u201eSud\u201c) je 12. maja 2021. godine ukinuo nalog Evropske komisije (\u201eKomisija\u201c) Amazonu da plati 250 miliona evra Luksemburgu, kao povra\u0107aj nedozvoljene dr\u017eavne pomoc\u0301i. Naime, Sud smatra da se inicijalno stanovi\u0161te Evropske komisije o navodnoj prednosti zasniva na analizi koja je neta\u010dna u nekoliko aspekata. Ukratko, Op\u0161ti sud tvrdi da nijedano stanovi\u0161te koje je Komisija iznela u pobijanoj odluci nije dovoljno da doka\u017ee postojanje prednosti u smislu \u010dlana 107 (1) Ugovora o funkcionisanju Evropske unije, usled \u010dega se pobijana odluka [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":18625,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[593,613,607,1534,967,1570,1536,1201,603,1607],"tags":[469,1617,691,633],"class_list":["post-18627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-593","category-drzavna-pomoc","category-evropska-komisija","category-evropsko-pravo","category-korporativno-pravo","category-poresko-pravo","category-pravo-eu-trgovina-prosirenje","category-pravo-evropske-unije","category-zastita-konkurencije-drzavna-pomoc","category-najnovije","tag-gecic-law-firm-serbia-sr","tag-amazon-sr","tag-competition-sr","tag-competition-law-sr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU | Geci\u0107 Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Drugi najvi\u0161i sud EU stao je na stranu tehnolo\u0161kog giganta zaklju\u010div\u0161i da Amazon ne duguje milione neplac\u0301enog poreza Luksemburgu.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sr_RS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU | Geci\u0107 Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Drugi najvi\u0161i sud EU stao je na stranu tehnolo\u0161kog giganta zaklju\u010div\u0161i da Amazon ne duguje milione neplac\u0301enog poreza Luksemburgu.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Geci\u0107 Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-06-07T08:00:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"770\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"421\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ivan Eftimov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Napisano od\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ivan Eftimov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Procenjeno vreme \u010ditanja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ivan Eftimov\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f2133a67125e7057bc0c58435c3532f9\"},\"headline\":\"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-07T08:00:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/\"},\"wordCount\":597,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Advokatska kancelarija Geci\u0107 Law\",\"amazon\",\"Konkurencija\",\"Pravo konkurencije\"],\"articleSection\":[\"\u0410\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0442 \/ \u041a\u043e\u043d\u043a\u0443\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430\",\"dr\u017eavna pomo\u0107\",\"Evropska komisija\",\"Evropsko pravo\",\"Korporativno pravo\",\"Poresko pravo\",\"Pravo EU, trgovina i pro\u0161irenje\",\"Pravo Evropske unije\",\"Za\u0161tita konkurencije \/ Dr\u017eavna pomo\u0107\",\"Najnovije\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/\",\"name\":\"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU | Geci\u0107 Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-07T08:00:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"Drugi najvi\u0161i sud EU stao je na stranu tehnolo\u0161kog giganta zaklju\u010div\u0161i da Amazon ne duguje milione neplac\u0301enog poreza Luksemburgu.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png\",\"width\":770,\"height\":421,\"caption\":\"Amazon wins tax case against the EU Commission.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/\",\"name\":\"Geci\u0107 Law\",\"description\":\"Advokatska kancelarija\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Geci\u0107 Law\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":409,\"caption\":\"Geci\u0107 Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f2133a67125e7057bc0c58435c3532f9\",\"name\":\"Ivan Eftimov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01054f24d3bbb4ef412bfacaf71306f068c8e1fab4435328367c58bf6ab606b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01054f24d3bbb4ef412bfacaf71306f068c8e1fab4435328367c58bf6ab606b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ivan Eftimov\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/author\/vanja\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU | Geci\u0107 Law","description":"Drugi najvi\u0161i sud EU stao je na stranu tehnolo\u0161kog giganta zaklju\u010div\u0161i da Amazon ne duguje milione neplac\u0301enog poreza Luksemburgu.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/","og_locale":"sr_RS","og_type":"article","og_title":"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU | Geci\u0107 Law","og_description":"Drugi najvi\u0161i sud EU stao je na stranu tehnolo\u0161kog giganta zaklju\u010div\u0161i da Amazon ne duguje milione neplac\u0301enog poreza Luksemburgu.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/","og_site_name":"Geci\u0107 Law","article_published_time":"2021-06-07T08:00:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":770,"height":421,"url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Ivan Eftimov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Napisano od":"Ivan Eftimov","Procenjeno vreme \u010ditanja":"3 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/"},"author":{"name":"Ivan Eftimov","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f2133a67125e7057bc0c58435c3532f9"},"headline":"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU","datePublished":"2021-06-07T08:00:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/"},"wordCount":597,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png","keywords":["Advokatska kancelarija Geci\u0107 Law","amazon","Konkurencija","Pravo konkurencije"],"articleSection":["\u0410\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0442 \/ \u041a\u043e\u043d\u043a\u0443\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430","dr\u017eavna pomo\u0107","Evropska komisija","Evropsko pravo","Korporativno pravo","Poresko pravo","Pravo EU, trgovina i pro\u0161irenje","Pravo Evropske unije","Za\u0161tita konkurencije \/ Dr\u017eavna pomo\u0107","Najnovije"],"inLanguage":"sr-RS"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/","url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/","name":"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU | Geci\u0107 Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png","datePublished":"2021-06-07T08:00:27+00:00","description":"Drugi najvi\u0161i sud EU stao je na stranu tehnolo\u0161kog giganta zaklju\u010div\u0161i da Amazon ne duguje milione neplac\u0301enog poreza Luksemburgu.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sr-RS","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sr-RS","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/amazon.png","width":770,"height":421,"caption":"Amazon wins tax case against the EU Commission."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/amazon-eu-porezi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Amazon dobio veliku poresku bitku protiv EU"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/","name":"Geci\u0107 Law","description":"Advokatska kancelarija","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sr-RS"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#organization","name":"Geci\u0107 Law","url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sr-RS","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/geciclaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png","width":1000,"height":409,"caption":"Geci\u0107 Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f2133a67125e7057bc0c58435c3532f9","name":"Ivan Eftimov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sr-RS","@id":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01054f24d3bbb4ef412bfacaf71306f068c8e1fab4435328367c58bf6ab606b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01054f24d3bbb4ef412bfacaf71306f068c8e1fab4435328367c58bf6ab606b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ivan Eftimov"},"url":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/author\/vanja\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18627"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18627\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18628,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18627\/revisions\/18628"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18625"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.geciclaw.com\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}